Total Conservation Programs in Clay County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 244
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Clay County, South Dakota totaled $1,369,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Carol Annette Knutson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $3,762 |
102 | Kathryn Barks Sd Irrevocable Trust | Beresford, SD 57004 | $3,567 |
103 | Jeffery Alan Solomon | Dakota Dunes, SD 57049 | $3,562 |
104 | Barbara J Rosenboom | Sheldon, IA 51201 | $3,469 |
105 | Richard E Abild | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $3,330 |
106 | Debra Elliott | Eden Prairie, MN 55347 | $3,301 |
107 | Dawn Fisher - Jensen | Hudson, WI 54016 | $3,301 |
108 | D Cynthia Chaney Revocable Trust | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $3,262 |
109 | Douglas Jay Hessman | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $3,244 |
110 | Joseph Lawrence Hubert | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $3,198 |
111 | Judy Robinson | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $3,195 |
112 | Ostlund-devany Legacy Land Trust | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $3,195 |
113 | Karl Leikvold | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $3,190 |
114 | Jeffrey Robert Hansen | Centerville, SD 57014 | $3,181 |
115 | Gregory Hansen | Hospers, IA 51238 | $3,181 |
116 | , | $3,123 | |
117 | Thorne Ltd Partnership | Concord, CA 94521 | $3,116 |
118 | Ronald A Johnson | Centerville, SD 57014 | $3,084 |
119 | Sandra K Van Dewalle | Yankton, SD 57078 | $2,991 |
120 | Samuel T Fischer | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $2,991 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”