Total Conservation Programs in Clay County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 261
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Clay County, South Dakota totaled $1,296,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Mark David Nelson | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $2,068 |
142 | Erlan Millard Olson | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $2,027 |
143 | Danny S Johnson | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $2,018 |
144 | Nada Landeen | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $2,014 |
145 | Adam Trudeau | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $1,978 |
146 | David John Trudeau | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $1,977 |
147 | Russell Dean Harts | Irene, SD 57037 | $1,854 |
148 | Kathryn Barks Sd Irrevocable Trust | Beresford, SD 57004 | $1,788 |
149 | Jean Knutson | Yankton, SD 57078 | $1,685 |
150 | Christopher Kinney | Beresford, SD 57004 | $1,680 |
151 | Lawrence Lee Birgen | Sioux Falls, SD 57105 | $1,654 |
152 | Randal Wayne Huot | Centerville, SD 57014 | $1,586 |
153 | Mark Francis Peterson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $1,584 |
154 | Pck Partnership | Beresford, SD 57004 | $1,578 |
155 | Robert A Nelson | Brandon, SD 57005 | $1,564 |
156 | Kyle Andreas Jensen | Meckling, SD 57069 | $1,544 |
157 | Marjean Van Scharrel | Howard, SD 57349 | $1,542 |
158 | Roger Lowell Jensen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $1,471 |
159 | Roger Turner | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $1,401 |
160 | Barbara A Stavrianos | Myersville, MD 21773 | $1,398 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”