Farm Subsidy information
Clay County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Clay County, South Dakota, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 760
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Clay County, South Dakota totaled $25,304,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Thomas E Dreesen | Meckling, SD 57069 | $147,191 |
22 | Reid Matthew Jensen | Burbank, SD 57010 | $146,488 |
23 | Jeffrey James Olson | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $146,349 |
24 | Thomas Merrigan | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $144,973 |
25 | Tiffany Vogt | Hartley, IA 51346 | $143,781 |
26 | James J Petrik | Gayville, SD 57031 | $143,344 |
27 | Blind Creek Farms Inc | Beresford, SD 57004 | $141,698 |
28 | Richard Dustin Johnson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $139,001 |
29 | Sheldon Dustin Johnson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $135,940 |
30 | Michael Jay Isaacson | Burbank, SD 57010 | $135,555 |
31 | Ronald W Huot | Centerville, SD 57014 | $129,319 |
32 | Emmick Farms Inc | Meckling, SD 57069 | $125,659 |
33 | Nicholas John Merrigan | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $124,784 |
34 | Freeburg Hay LLC | Gayville, SD 57031 | $119,772 |
35 | James Morrison | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $118,637 |
36 | Charles Herbert Peterson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $117,773 |
37 | Daniel Mike Rederick | Volin, SD 57072 | $115,064 |
38 | Michael Dennis Manning | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $114,707 |
39 | Richard Gregoire | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $111,785 |
40 | Richard Gene Orr | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $110,906 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”