Total Emergency Relief Program in Clay County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 251
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Clay County, South Dakota totaled $6,143,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Daniel Mike Rederick | Volin, SD 57072 | $261,070 |
2 | Timothy Thissell | Beresford, SD 57004 | $191,821 |
3 | James Morrison | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $158,125 |
4 | Randy G Jensen | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $138,775 |
5 | Michael Todd Huth | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $127,324 |
6 | Charles Herbert Peterson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $126,723 |
7 | Thomas Vincent Hall | Burbank, SD 57010 | $112,646 |
8 | Mark Francis Peterson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $110,438 |
9 | Mc Farms Inc | Burbank, SD 57010 | $108,896 |
10 | Larry Wayne Hawley | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $105,054 |
11 | Donnie Gene Peterson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $104,500 |
12 | Ricky Allen Wolfswinkel | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $102,729 |
13 | Bruce Arnold Mockler | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $102,048 |
14 | Johnathan Stevan Peterson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $92,309 |
15 | Robert T Heine | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $86,399 |
16 | Missouri River Farms Inc | Yankton, SD 57078 | $79,329 |
17 | Gary Orin Andersen | Centerville, SD 57014 | $77,993 |
18 | Dan K Huth | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $76,928 |
19 | Richard Gregoire | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $75,020 |
20 | Gregory D Ostrem | Centerville, SD 57014 | $74,067 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>