Farm Subsidy information
Codington County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Codington County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 447
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Codington County, South Dakota totaled $14,768,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Troy Stimson | Watertown, SD 57201 | $46,001 |
22 | Jamco Llp | Watertown, SD 57201 | $45,826 |
23 | Westley A Even | Watertown, SD 57201 | $45,071 |
24 | Cari Even | Watertown, SD 57201 | $45,071 |
25 | Leroy And Joyce Bergan Llp | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $43,524 |
26 | David John Thyen | Waverly, SD 57201 | $42,162 |
27 | Greg Alan Kliegel | Watertown, SD 57201 | $41,011 |
28 | Williston Inc | Watertown, SD 57201 | $39,953 |
29 | Bmsw Prtnrshp | Watertown, SD 57201 | $39,912 |
30 | Lar Trust | Sacramento, CA 95833 | $39,226 |
31 | Jon F Dagel | Florence, SD 57235 | $38,161 |
32 | Modak Dairy Inc | Goodwin, SD 57238 | $34,955 |
33 | Mark Hoverstadt | Florence, SD 57235 | $33,784 |
34 | Sioux River Dairy Inc | Watertown, SD 57201 | $33,117 |
35 | John Kittelson Farms Inc | Henry, SD 57243 | $33,017 |
36 | Bergh Family Land LLC | Wallace, SD 57272 | $32,228 |
37 | , | $31,323 | |
38 | Edward Morrison | Florence, SD 57235 | $30,835 |
39 | Linda Mae Peterson | Florence, SD 57235 | $30,472 |
40 | Larame D Zimprich | Hazel, SD 57242 | $30,352 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”