Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments in Codington County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 116
Recipients of Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments from farms in Codington County, South Dakota totaled $1,729,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Roger Amdahl | South Shore, SD 57263 | $4,083 |
82 | Emil Mack | Watertown, SD 57201 | $3,969 |
83 | Ryan Adam Caulfield | Wallace, SD 57272 | $3,936 |
84 | Matthew Kuhlman | Hazel, SD 57242 | $3,681 |
85 | Todd Mc Gillivary | Watertown, SD 57201 | $3,407 |
86 | Eugene E Curley | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $3,126 |
87 | Jeff York | Henry, SD 57243 | $3,126 |
88 | Scott M Maag | Florence, SD 57235 | $3,039 |
89 | Steven Maag | Watertown, SD 57201 | $3,039 |
90 | Bret A Mc Gillivary | Watertown, SD 57201 | $2,963 |
91 | Timothy Grygiel | Florence, SD 57235 | $2,596 |
92 | Maurice Lee Gunderson | Watertown, SD 57201 | $2,434 |
93 | James Allan Caulfield Jr | Bradley, SD 57217 | $2,306 |
94 | Harlan Maag | Watertown, SD 57201 | $2,301 |
95 | Marianne Magruder | Elk River, MN 55330 | $1,976 |
96 | Nathan Daniel Thyen | Waverly, SD 57201 | $1,872 |
97 | Stacy Lane Britzman | Watertown, SD 57201 | $1,794 |
98 | Tom Sumner | Florence, SD 57235 | $1,681 |
99 | Nelson Grain Farms LLC | Summit, SD 57266 | $1,627 |
100 | Matthew Rausch | Watertown, SD 57201 | $1,527 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”