Farm Subsidy information
Codington County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Codington County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 490
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Codington County, South Dakota totaled $16,041,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Loren Fleming | Florence, SD 57235 | $17,639 |
102 | Joshua Fleming | Watertown, SD 57201 | $17,525 |
103 | C S Farms Inc | Florence, SD 57235 | $17,505 |
104 | Marla J Peters | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $17,455 |
105 | Neal Schafer | Florence, SD 57235 | $17,299 |
106 | Brian Stoltenburg | Watertown, SD 57201 | $17,218 |
107 | Born Farms Inc | Hazel, SD 57242 | $16,768 |
108 | Thomas M Arnesen | Florence, SD 57235 | $16,688 |
109 | Steven Michael Owen | Garden City, SD 57236 | $16,419 |
110 | Benjamin G Fleming | Florence, SD 57235 | $16,368 |
111 | Joel Edward Chilson | Florence, SD 57235 | $16,133 |
112 | , | $15,517 | |
113 | Larry Bergh | Wallace, SD 57272 | $15,487 |
114 | Kipp Morrison | Florence, SD 57235 | $15,441 |
115 | Larin Bunde | Watertown, SD 57201 | $15,324 |
116 | Dianna J Meisenheimer | Watertown, SD 57201 | $15,032 |
117 | Joel Charles Willette | Watertown, SD 57201 | $15,023 |
118 | Larry D Halse | Florence, SD 57235 | $14,914 |
119 | Doris -richard&doris Wilkey Rev Trust Wilkey | Watertown, SD 57201 | $14,808 |
120 | Jordan Foster | Henry, SD 57243 | $14,771 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”