Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Codington County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 314
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Codington County, South Dakota totaled $3,459,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | James Beskow | Watertown, SD 57201 | $7,380 |
142 | Leland Carl Kettwig | Hazel, SD 57242 | $7,345 |
143 | Bruce R Egerstrom | Watertown, SD 57201 | $7,306 |
144 | Brent M Zemlicka | Watertown, SD 57201 | $7,169 |
145 | Myron Eidsness | Henry, SD 57243 | $7,119 |
146 | Nathan Daniel Thyen | Waverly, SD 57201 | $6,793 |
147 | Krause Farms | Watertown, SD 57201 | $6,690 |
148 | Wm E Lindner | Watertown, SD 57201 | $6,655 |
149 | Lee Wasland | Henry, SD 57243 | $6,584 |
150 | Braxton Owen | Henry, SD 57243 | $6,559 |
151 | Lynn E Johnson | Ortley, SD 57256 | $6,544 |
152 | Emm Ag LLC | Florence, SD 57235 | $6,535 |
153 | Jessie Joseph Monnens | Hazel, SD 57242 | $6,527 |
154 | Jeffrey Michael Lenards | Goodwin, SD 57238 | $6,248 |
155 | Last Borcus Standing Inc | Henry, SD 57243 | $6,139 |
156 | Kipp Morrison | Florence, SD 57235 | $6,106 |
157 | Christopher John Hanten | Watertown, SD 57201 | $5,925 |
158 | Bret A Mc Gillivary | Watertown, SD 57201 | $5,850 |
159 | James Comes | Waverly, SD 57201 | $5,842 |
160 | Endres Ag Enterprises Inc | Watertown, SD 57201 | $5,728 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”