Farm Subsidy information
Corson County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Corson County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,566
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Corson County, South Dakota totaled $293,034,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Seiler Family Trust | Mc Intosh, SD 57641 | $401,576 |
122 | Stephanie Marie Schmidt | Solen, ND 58570 | $397,568 |
123 | Jay Evenson | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $396,048 |
124 | William Burress | Isabel, SD 57633 | $394,215 |
125 | Robert A Edinger | Mc Intosh, SD 57641 | $393,248 |
126 | Sonny S Sandquist | Trail City, SD 57657 | $387,559 |
127 | Brian L Dreiske | Keldron, SD 57634 | $387,440 |
128 | Lloyd Campbell | Mobridge, SD 57601 | $386,085 |
129 | Roger Lee Vander Vorst | Mobridge, SD 57601 | $383,629 |
130 | Royce Walker | Mc Laughlin, SD 57642 | $378,677 |
131 | Ronald Walker | Mc Laughlin, SD 57642 | $377,243 |
132 | Dale R Campbell | Keldron, SD 57634 | $375,196 |
133 | Corby Dean Meyer | Mc Intosh, SD 57641 | $374,077 |
134 | Ray C Kling | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $374,067 |
135 | Robert E Nehl | Watauga, SD 57660 | $371,932 |
136 | Katus Ranch Joint Venture | Watauga, SD 57660 | $371,084 |
137 | Robert E Mizera | Mc Laughlin, SD 57642 | $369,935 |
138 | Mark Baumberger | Watauga, SD 57660 | $368,794 |
139 | Walter I Hager | Mobridge, SD 57601 | $366,712 |
140 | John E Hetzel | Keldron, SD 57634 | $366,119 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”