Farm Subsidy information
Custer County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Custer County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 206
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Custer County, South Dakota totaled $2,247,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Clyde M Gorsuch | Fairburn, SD 57738 | $6,380 |
62 | Thomas L Kaiser | Hermosa, SD 57744 | $6,344 |
63 | Steven Glen Trump | Custer, SD 57730 | $6,046 |
64 | Bondurant Ranch Inc | Buffalo Gap, SD 57722 | $5,968 |
65 | Kirk Cattle & Land Co LLC | Custer, SD 57730 | $5,748 |
66 | Anna Marie Evans | Pringle, SD 57773 | $5,693 |
67 | Gene G Ferguson | Hermosa, SD 57744 | $5,675 |
68 | Streeter Family Lp | Johnstown, CO 80534 | $5,664 |
69 | Barton J Uhlir | Hermosa, SD 57744 | $5,486 |
70 | Lyle-lyle G & Donna M Rev. Living Trust Hartshorn | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $5,479 |
71 | Tate Martin Halverson | Hermosa, SD 57744 | $5,442 |
72 | Fred Rittberger | Hermosa, SD 57744 | $5,376 |
73 | Donald Kolb | Buffalo Gap, SD 57722 | $5,233 |
74 | Merle Semmler | Buffalo Gap, SD 57722 | $4,957 |
75 | Fleur De Lis Land LLC | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $4,915 |
76 | Rogers River Ranch Llp | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $4,753 |
77 | Patricia J Gregerson | Fairburn, SD 57738 | $4,498 |
78 | Timothy J Hammel | Hot Springs, SD 57747 | $4,448 |
79 | Evergreen Ranching And Livestock LLC | Custer, SD 57730 | $4,396 |
80 | Dillon F Schroth | Buffalo Gap, SD 57722 | $4,320 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”