Farm Subsidy information
Custer County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Custer County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 612
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Custer County, South Dakota totaled $37,480,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Loren O'neill | Hermosa, SD 57744 | $81,558 |
102 | Mountain Energy LLC | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $77,598 |
103 | Dakota Partnership | Rapid City, SD 57709 | $77,576 |
104 | Ribob-eljim-kaden | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $77,447 |
105 | Betty Ott | Hermosa, SD 57744 | $75,123 |
106 | Evergreen Ranching And Livestock LLC | Custer, SD 57730 | $72,783 |
107 | Merle Semmler | Buffalo Gap, SD 57722 | $71,935 |
108 | Ted R Williams | Fairburn, SD 57738 | $69,764 |
109 | Tate Martin Halverson | Hermosa, SD 57744 | $68,119 |
110 | Ron Emerson | Hermosa, SD 57744 | $67,565 |
111 | James A Lintz | Hermosa, SD 57744 | $65,407 |
112 | Jeff Harkey | Hermosa, SD 57744 | $64,968 |
113 | Jim L Varelman | Rapid City, SD 57703 | $64,719 |
114 | Herbert G Kaiser | Hermosa, SD 57744 | $64,683 |
115 | Zeimet Family Limited Partnership | Pringle, SD 57773 | $64,232 |
116 | Ron Burney | Buffalo Gap, SD 57722 | $64,183 |
117 | Timothy Arthur Kirk | Custer, SD 57730 | $63,438 |
118 | Trout Haven Ranch | Buffalo Gap, SD 57722 | $62,011 |
119 | Helen M Callan | Hermosa, SD 57744 | $60,222 |
120 | Spring Valley Ranch | Custer, SD 57730 | $59,520 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”