Total Commodity Programs in Davison County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 84
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Davison County, South Dakota totaled $819,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Norman James Neugebauer | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $11,875 |
22 | Donald Paul Blindauer | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $11,875 |
23 | Richard Allen Gerlach | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $11,875 |
24 | Lewis Gordon Bainbridge | Ethan, SD 57334 | $11,875 |
25 | Gene Stehly | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $11,875 |
26 | Dan J Moller | Stickney, SD 57375 | $11,875 |
27 | Gregg Shawn Stahl | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $11,875 |
28 | Craig Stehly | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $11,875 |
29 | Gordon Todd Stahl | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $11,875 |
30 | Denise Stehly | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $11,875 |
31 | Tim Neugebauer | Ethan, SD 57334 | $11,875 |
32 | Hetland Farms Inc | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $11,875 |
33 | Dale Larsch | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $11,875 |
34 | Miiller Land & Cattle LLC | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $11,875 |
35 | , | $11,875 | |
36 | Victor Lee Wieczorek | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $11,304 |
37 | Jessica Mueller | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $10,725 |
38 | Dwain Scheetz | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $10,255 |
39 | Kristina Jean Blindauer | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $10,005 |
40 | Bradley E Nesheim | Dimock, SD 57331 | $8,661 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”