Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in Davison County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 106
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in Davison County, South Dakota totaled $522,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | William Slovek | Philip, SD 57567 | $3,141 |
42 | Ryan Youngstrom | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $3,079 |
43 | Brad Mcnary | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $3,079 |
44 | Jarod L Klock | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $3,079 |
45 | Bryce Havlik | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $3,056 |
46 | Daniel Lee Roeder | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $2,903 |
47 | Darwin L Morrison | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $2,785 |
48 | Brent Wieczorek | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $2,762 |
49 | Edwin P Sigmund | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $2,685 |
50 | Joseph D Vermeulen | Letcher, SD 57359 | $2,588 |
51 | Martin Farms | Letcher, SD 57359 | $2,498 |
52 | Donald Mcbrayer Jr | Ethan, SD 57334 | $2,389 |
53 | Daniel Paul Schlaffman | Ethan, SD 57334 | $2,335 |
54 | Larry Joe Klumb | Ethan, SD 57334 | $2,235 |
55 | Loren Charles Wegehaupt | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $2,200 |
56 | Danny V Morgan | Letcher, SD 57359 | $2,145 |
57 | William Dean Nebelsick | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $1,979 |
58 | Chris Edward Nebelsick | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $1,979 |
59 | Joel R Wieczorek | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $1,913 |
60 | Mark A Hohn | Ethan, SD 57334 | $1,854 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”