Counter Cyclical Program in Davison County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 564
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Davison County, South Dakota totaled $3,831,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Cameron Hutterian Brethren, Inc. | Viborg, SD 57070 | $23,763 |
42 | Darwin William Kreth | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $22,411 |
43 | Darwin Everson | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $22,146 |
44 | Alan Craig Greenway | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $21,497 |
45 | James Allen Johnson | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $21,479 |
46 | Richard H Larsch | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $20,767 |
47 | Richard Allen Gerlach | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $20,543 |
48 | A Mike Schoenfelder | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $20,458 |
49 | Loren Charles Wegehaupt | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $20,090 |
50 | David John Deinert | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $19,952 |
51 | Ronald Deinert | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $19,952 |
52 | Cory J Easton | Fulton, SD 57340 | $19,567 |
53 | Timothy Leonard Storm | Ethan, SD 57334 | $19,566 |
54 | Michael Dean Miiller | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $19,553 |
55 | Ronald Roth | Fulton, SD 57340 | $19,505 |
56 | Ray Hanson | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $19,396 |
57 | Tim Neugebauer | Ethan, SD 57334 | $19,113 |
58 | Edward Luvern Neugebauer | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $19,110 |
59 | Norman James Neugebauer | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $19,110 |
60 | Brian Sonne | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $18,782 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”