Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Davison County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 211
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Davison County, South Dakota totaled $161,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Christopher Michael Plamp | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $1,026 |
42 | David John Deinert | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $1,026 |
43 | James M Edwards | Letcher, SD 57359 | $977 |
44 | Gregg Shawn Stahl | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $937 |
45 | Richard J Podzimek | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $931 |
46 | Ryan Charles Storm | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $915 |
47 | Justin L Johnson | White Lake, SD 57383 | $911 |
48 | David Louis Nebelsick | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $897 |
49 | Richard Allen Gerlach | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $883 |
50 | Charles Francis Goldammer | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $874 |
51 | Jeff P Vermeulen | Letcher, SD 57359 | $873 |
52 | Chipp Gerlach | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $863 |
53 | Dale Kenneth Smith | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $855 |
54 | Brent Wieczorek | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $831 |
55 | Kyle Baker | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $806 |
56 | Jared Leon Storm | Ethan, SD 57334 | $783 |
57 | Lorang Farms | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $753 |
58 | Blaide Hanson | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $696 |
59 | Bryce Havlik | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $682 |
60 | Thomas A Weber | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $638 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”