Market Loss Assistance Program in Davison County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 648
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Davison County, South Dakota totaled $5,756,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Terry Anderson | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $30,910 |
42 | Norman Maeschen | Ethan, SD 57334 | $30,688 |
43 | Robert L Olsen | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $30,625 |
44 | Gary D Blase | Ethan, SD 57334 | $30,411 |
45 | William Dean Nebelsick | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $29,686 |
46 | Mark Allen Meier | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $29,624 |
47 | Douglas Miiller | Ethan, SD 57334 | $29,557 |
48 | Steven Joseph Hoffman | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $29,460 |
49 | Burt Wilson | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $29,397 |
50 | Dale Ralph Kroupa | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $27,703 |
51 | Gordon Todd Stahl | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $26,973 |
52 | Delmar Dean Mueller | Ethan, SD 57334 | $26,772 |
53 | George Ryks Jr | Ethan, SD 57334 | $26,769 |
54 | Leona M Stehly | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $25,283 |
55 | Ronald R Baker | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $25,165 |
56 | Richard Allen Gerlach | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $25,038 |
57 | Warren Eugene Kluth | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $24,870 |
58 | Dan J Moller | Stickney, SD 57375 | $24,788 |
59 | Loren Charles Wegehaupt | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $24,511 |
60 | Harold Dean Bowman | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $23,956 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”