Production Flexibility Program in Davison County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 725
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Davison County, South Dakota totaled $10,516,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Steve J Weber | Dimock, SD 57331 | $35,610 |
82 | Lawrence Harold Bialas | Parkston, SD 57366 | $35,246 |
83 | Wade Robert Strand | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $35,032 |
84 | Harvard Hetland | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $34,980 |
85 | Timothy Leonard Storm | Ethan, SD 57334 | $34,775 |
86 | Don Williams | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $34,757 |
87 | S T & R Farms Inc | Parkston, SD 57366 | $34,650 |
88 | Norman James Neugebauer | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $34,510 |
89 | Edward Luvern Neugebauer | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $34,508 |
90 | Thomas Laverne Greenway | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $34,165 |
91 | Lincoln Jerome Neugebauer | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $33,349 |
92 | Eugene Fristad | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $33,344 |
93 | Larry Neugebauer | Ethan, SD 57334 | $33,182 |
94 | Robert Deboer - Robert M Deboer Revocable Living T | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $33,167 |
95 | Randal Lee Rumbolz | Dimock, SD 57331 | $32,804 |
96 | Richard Lee Wadleigh | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $32,329 |
97 | Leroy Dodd | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $32,242 |
98 | Tim Neugebauer | Ethan, SD 57334 | $32,130 |
99 | Riggs Farms Inc | Ethan, SD 57334 | $32,117 |
100 | James W Helling | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $32,030 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”