Total Conservation Programs in Davison County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 192
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Davison County, South Dakota totaled $1,655,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Carolyn Doescher | Brandon, SD 57005 | $6,504 |
82 | , | $6,503 | |
83 | Matt Hohn | Ethan, SD 57334 | $6,496 |
84 | Daniel Paul Schlaffman | Ethan, SD 57334 | $5,921 |
85 | Mary Ann Osen | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $5,541 |
86 | Patrick Casey | Denver, CO 80238 | $5,522 |
87 | Kay Schoenfelder | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $5,412 |
88 | David Paul Sibson | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $5,149 |
89 | White Acre LLC | Sioux Falls, SD 57104 | $5,104 |
90 | Shawn Murtha | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $4,963 |
91 | Ranae L Schoenrock | Fulton, SD 57340 | $4,890 |
92 | Richard Dierks | Sioux Falls, SD 57106 | $4,855 |
93 | Tate Williams | Letcher, SD 57359 | $4,666 |
94 | Kathryn E Kurtenbach Revocable Living Trust | Groton, SD 57445 | $4,649 |
95 | Tanner Lewis Riggs | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $4,552 |
96 | Ronald L Moller | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $4,270 |
97 | 2012 Lynnette R Klaas Irrevocable Trust | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $4,165 |
98 | Terry Feterl | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $4,067 |
99 | Steve Vlieger | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $3,839 |
100 | Michael D Haley | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $3,832 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”