Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Davison County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 211
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Davison County, South Dakota totaled $161,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Luke Ryks | Ethan, SD 57334 | $394 |
102 | Michael W Wingen | Canova, SD 57321 | $391 |
103 | James Vermeulen | Letcher, SD 57359 | $391 |
104 | Brian Sonne | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $373 |
105 | Troy Haag | Dimock, SD 57331 | $367 |
106 | Ray Trudeau | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $359 |
107 | Brad Mcnary | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $350 |
108 | Michael Joseph Gassman | Canova, SD 57321 | $346 |
109 | Jolene Marie Baker | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $344 |
110 | Lynn Edwin Schultz | Emery, SD 57332 | $343 |
111 | Joel Weber | Parkston, SD 57366 | $339 |
112 | Robert Henglefelt | Ethan, SD 57334 | $326 |
113 | David Nolz | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $321 |
114 | Jason Gerald Moke | Ethan, SD 57334 | $318 |
115 | Edward Luvern Neugebauer | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $314 |
116 | Norman James Neugebauer | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $314 |
117 | Tim Neugebauer | Ethan, SD 57334 | $314 |
118 | , | $310 | |
119 | Jared Nesheim | Ethan, SD 57334 | $297 |
120 | Bart James Laber | Delmont, SD 57330 | $293 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”