Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Davison County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 178
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Davison County, South Dakota totaled $909,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | David John Deinert | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $60,988 |
2 | Patricia Lou Wieczorek | Chaska, MN 55318 | $55,755 |
3 | John Lee Wieczorek | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $55,755 |
4 | Broken Heart Ranch Inc | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $35,077 |
5 | Robert D Maeschen | Ethan, SD 57334 | $34,924 |
6 | Nesheim Farms LLC | Ethan, SD 57334 | $21,803 |
7 | Benjamin Melvin Klumb | Ethan, SD 57334 | $20,984 |
8 | Jennifer M Klumb | Ethan, SD 57334 | $20,984 |
9 | Michelle Lea Klumb | Ethan, SD 57334 | $20,984 |
10 | Matt Bode | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $19,075 |
11 | Wayne Gronseth | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $13,919 |
12 | Jones And Klumb Family Farm LLC | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $13,564 |
13 | Ronald Simon | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $13,230 |
14 | Shannon Gustave Klumb | Ethan, SD 57334 | $12,512 |
15 | Michael C Deinert | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $11,853 |
16 | Donald Paul Blindauer | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $10,466 |
17 | Richard Allen Gerlach | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $10,459 |
18 | Chad Alan Blindauer | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $10,421 |
19 | Jeffrey Wayne Gerlach | Stickney, SD 57375 | $9,404 |
20 | Gary L Neugebauer | Ethan, SD 57334 | $9,366 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>