Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in Davison County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 106
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in Davison County, South Dakota totaled $522,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Troy Haag | Dimock, SD 57331 | $80,740 |
2 | Steven Joseph Hoffman | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $30,828 |
3 | Andrew John Ewing | Letcher, SD 57359 | $28,799 |
4 | A Mike Schoenfelder | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $25,103 |
5 | Joseph Michael Schoenfelder | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $24,462 |
6 | Robert L Ball | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $20,800 |
7 | Matthew John Baker | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $18,623 |
8 | Richard Allen Gerlach | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $18,087 |
9 | Thomas James Freidel | Ethan, SD 57334 | $13,125 |
10 | Robert Deboer - Robert M Deboer Revocable Living T | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $11,074 |
11 | Lewis Gordon Bainbridge | Ethan, SD 57334 | $9,339 |
12 | James Lewis Ewing Jr | Letcher, SD 57359 | $8,952 |
13 | Wayne Gronseth | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $8,942 |
14 | Maui Farms Partnership | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $7,302 |
15 | Hohn Cattle Company Partnership | Ethan, SD 57334 | $6,635 |
16 | Matthew Lewis Bainbridge | Ethan, SD 57334 | $6,393 |
17 | Tom Suhr | Dimock, SD 57331 | $6,390 |
18 | Charles R Hoxsie | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $6,338 |
19 | Lorang Farms | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $6,159 |
20 | Robert Henglefelt | Ethan, SD 57334 | $5,810 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>