Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Davison County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 211
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Davison County, South Dakota totaled $161,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Shannon Larson | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $14,503 |
2 | Jones And Klumb Family Farm LLC | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $10,909 |
3 | Broken Heart Ranch Inc | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $9,074 |
4 | Monte Fristad | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $6,355 |
5 | Barclay Kreth | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $3,514 |
6 | Shannon Gustave Klumb | Ethan, SD 57334 | $3,364 |
7 | Benjamin Melvin Klumb | Ethan, SD 57334 | $3,364 |
8 | Joseph D Vermeulen | Letcher, SD 57359 | $3,015 |
9 | Bryan Vogel | Ethan, SD 57334 | $2,851 |
10 | Steven Joseph Hoffman | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $2,485 |
11 | George Ryks Jr | Ethan, SD 57334 | $2,471 |
12 | Ronald Deinert | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $2,255 |
13 | Bradley Scott Greenway | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $1,919 |
14 | Wayne Gronseth | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $1,866 |
15 | Donald Paul Blindauer | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $1,835 |
16 | James R Jorgensen | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $1,793 |
17 | Hohn Cattle Company Partnership | Ethan, SD 57334 | $1,769 |
18 | Ronnie L Long | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $1,764 |
19 | Michael C Deinert | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $1,724 |
20 | Daniel E Pollard | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $1,674 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>