Total Emergency Relief Program in Davison County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 173
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Davison County, South Dakota totaled $2,041,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Matthew Urban Storm | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $85,067 |
2 | , | $70,905 | |
3 | Cheryl Herrmann | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $52,878 |
4 | Tim Neugebauer | Ethan, SD 57334 | $51,925 |
5 | Timothy Leonard Storm | Ethan, SD 57334 | $46,155 |
6 | Julie Ann Greenway | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $44,784 |
7 | John Lee Wieczorek | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $39,335 |
8 | David John Deinert | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $39,299 |
9 | Norman James Neugebauer | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $37,264 |
10 | Miiller Land & Cattle LLC | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $36,147 |
11 | Wayne Gronseth | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $33,716 |
12 | Jones And Klumb Family Farm LLC | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $32,546 |
13 | Gene Stehly | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $30,566 |
14 | Denise Stehly | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $30,566 |
15 | Tyson B Bialas | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $27,815 |
16 | Jane Stehly | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $27,476 |
17 | Craig Stehly | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $27,476 |
18 | Shannon Gustave Klumb | Ethan, SD 57334 | $26,789 |
19 | Benjamin Melvin Klumb | Ethan, SD 57334 | $26,789 |
20 | Jane Michelle Goldammer | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $25,519 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>