Total Emergency Relief Program in Day County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 368
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Day County, South Dakota totaled $16,260,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Bernard Gaikowski | Waubay, SD 57273 | $91,635 |
62 | Donald Claire Olson | Langford, SD 57454 | $91,592 |
63 | David Alan Johnson | Webster, SD 57274 | $90,745 |
64 | Jon Raap | Bristol, SD 57219 | $86,694 |
65 | Greg Bonn | Conde, SD 57434 | $84,643 |
66 | Douglas Eidahl | Groton, SD 57445 | $83,108 |
67 | Dennis J Peckham | Bristol, SD 57219 | $82,741 |
68 | Harold Orr | Bristol, SD 57219 | $78,894 |
69 | , | $76,033 | |
70 | Richard - Richard Smeins Revocable Trust Smeins | Langford, SD 57454 | $75,786 |
71 | Steven Rumpza | Webster, SD 57274 | $75,323 |
72 | Jon R Voss Farms Inc | Groton, SD 57445 | $74,397 |
73 | Zenk Farms LLC | Webster, SD 57274 | $74,186 |
74 | La Ron Larry Herr | Bristol, SD 57219 | $73,629 |
75 | Loren A Helmer | Andover, SD 57422 | $72,960 |
76 | Aaron D Johnson | Bristol, SD 57219 | $69,676 |
77 | Nikki Amundson | Webster, SD 57274 | $69,391 |
78 | B-f James & Sons Inc | Webster, SD 57274 | $69,007 |
79 | Joshua T Gaikowski | Webster, SD 57274 | $68,697 |
80 | James L Hommel | Webster, SD 57274 | $68,188 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”