Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Day County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 408
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Day County, South Dakota totaled $4,474,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Brent L Zimmerman | Bristol, SD 57219 | $17,533 |
82 | Vickie Zimmerman | Bristol, SD 57219 | $17,533 |
83 | Ronald S Boik | Grenville, SD 57239 | $17,485 |
84 | Aaron D Johnson | Bristol, SD 57219 | $17,066 |
85 | Sara L Johnson | Bristol, SD 57219 | $17,065 |
86 | Stephen D Sigdestad | Pierpont, SD 57468 | $16,820 |
87 | Lizabeth D Sigdestad | Pierpont, SD 57468 | $16,820 |
88 | Leeron Edwin Paszek | Grenville, SD 57239 | $16,627 |
89 | Jolene Catherine Herr | Bristol, SD 57219 | $16,190 |
90 | La Ron Larry Herr | Bristol, SD 57219 | $16,190 |
91 | Kevin Anderson | Andover, SD 57422 | $16,127 |
92 | Damon Witt | Bristol, SD 57219 | $16,061 |
93 | Michael David Morrison | Waubay, SD 57273 | $15,961 |
94 | Brian Sanderson | Conde, SD 57434 | $15,695 |
95 | Morgan Holler | Pierpont, SD 57468 | $15,545 |
96 | Fossum Family Company | Lily, SD 57274 | $15,457 |
97 | Duerre Farms Inc | Bristol, SD 57219 | $15,444 |
98 | James R Mckane III | Andover, SD 57422 | $14,862 |
99 | John E Trautner | Webster, SD 57274 | $14,774 |
100 | Dennis A Johnson | Webster, SD 57274 | $14,432 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”