Conservation Reserve Program in Deuel County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 361
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Deuel County, South Dakota totaled $2,338,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Lori A Puetz | Clear Lake, SD 57226 | $17,321 |
42 | James A Peterson | Brandt, SD 57218 | $17,040 |
43 | John Homan | Watertown, SD 57201 | $16,100 |
44 | Tim R Kloos | Gary, SD 57237 | $15,998 |
45 | Terry Milton | Astoria, SD 57213 | $15,976 |
46 | Dennis D Evenson | Clear Lake, SD 57226 | $15,700 |
47 | Beth Stuerman | Sterling, MA 01564 | $15,698 |
48 | Rusty A Brandsrud | Estelline, SD 57234 | $15,458 |
49 | Scott Schafer | Jasper, MN 56144 | $15,316 |
50 | Heath Stone | Gary, SD 57237 | $15,049 |
51 | Brookings Deuel Rws | Toronto, SD 57268 | $14,626 |
52 | Suzanne M Jacobson Trust | Watertown, SD 57201 | $14,067 |
53 | Tetzlaff Farms Inc | Watertown, SD 57201 | $13,576 |
54 | Gloria Sommervold | Roseville, CA 95661 | $13,324 |
55 | Benjamin Kullman | Waconia, MN 55387 | $13,299 |
56 | Gary E Sander | Gary, SD 57237 | $13,248 |
57 | Gail Sander | Venice, FL 34293 | $13,248 |
58 | Walseth Purcell Partnership | Clearwater, MN 55320 | $13,244 |
59 | Richard Lounsbery | Revillo, SD 57259 | $13,063 |
60 | Robert H Curtis | Redfield, SD 57469 | $13,030 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”