Farm Subsidy information
Deuel County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Deuel County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 631
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Deuel County, South Dakota totaled $14,331,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jeffrey Watt | Estelline, SD 57234 | $27,475 |
62 | David And Martha Wittnebel Family LLC | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $25,982 |
63 | Champaygn Ranch Inc | Goodwin, SD 57238 | $25,674 |
64 | Dwayne M Gorder | Estelline, SD 57234 | $25,637 |
65 | Eugene A Hamann | Clear Lake, SD 57226 | $25,069 |
66 | Paul Peterson | Brandt, SD 57218 | $24,707 |
67 | Casey D Magedanz | Revillo, SD 57259 | $24,236 |
68 | Steven J Hansen | Clear Lake, SD 57226 | $24,236 |
69 | Vincent L Parker | Clear Lake, SD 57226 | $24,217 |
70 | Bruce A Harringa Revocable Trust | Toronto, SD 57268 | $24,140 |
71 | Lewaine A Krause | Clear Lake, SD 57226 | $22,938 |
72 | Eric Bergquist | Estelline, SD 57234 | $22,196 |
73 | Kevin D Konold | Clear Lake, SD 57226 | $21,904 |
74 | Jason E Toben | Clear Lake, SD 57226 | $21,691 |
75 | Larry L Stohr | Altamont, SD 57226 | $21,594 |
76 | A & T Rahlf LLC | Clear Lake, SD 57226 | $21,436 |
77 | Joy Prehn | Clear Lake, SD 57226 | $20,970 |
78 | Roger Meyer | Watertown, SD 57201 | $20,679 |
79 | Robert F Raml | Watertown, SD 57201 | $20,044 |
80 | Ladell E Goodroad | Brandt, SD 57218 | $19,971 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”