Farm Subsidy information
Deuel County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Deuel County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 832
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Deuel County, South Dakota totaled $17,805,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Dale V Stroschein | Toronto, SD 57268 | $31,221 |
102 | Thomas E Kolb | Goodwin, SD 57238 | $30,652 |
103 | Roger M Kreutner | Revillo, SD 57259 | $30,603 |
104 | Duwayne And Rita Mack Living Trust | Brookings, SD 57006 | $30,252 |
105 | Joe E Bernhard | Harrisburg, SD 57032 | $30,167 |
106 | Chase B Porter | Harrisburg, SD 57032 | $30,167 |
107 | Scott Pederson | Gary, SD 57237 | $30,105 |
108 | Justin Stamp | Marietta, MN 56257 | $29,444 |
109 | Lane W Tekrony | Clear Lake, SD 57226 | $29,078 |
110 | Lewaine A Krause | Clear Lake, SD 57226 | $28,880 |
111 | Miltons Farms-judith Sonnenburg | Estelline, SD 57234 | $28,864 |
112 | Scott A Thompson | Estelline, SD 57234 | $28,681 |
113 | Christopher Uckert | Clear Lake, SD 57226 | $28,449 |
114 | Creighton Family Land Trust | Watertown, SD 57201 | $28,332 |
115 | Dale K Foster | Estelline, SD 57234 | $28,136 |
116 | Justin Lee Steele | Canby, MN 56220 | $27,722 |
117 | Doyle D Thompson | Gary, SD 57237 | $27,648 |
118 | Neal C Boeke | Clear Lake, SD 57226 | $27,160 |
119 | Keith A Hinderaker | Astoria, SD 57213 | $26,819 |
120 | Joy Prehn | Clear Lake, SD 57226 | $26,687 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”