Farm Subsidy information
Dewey County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Dewey County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,433
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Dewey County, South Dakota totaled $219,313,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Doug Maher | Eagle Butte, SD 57625 | $462,547 |
82 | Oleary Brothers Inc | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $460,476 |
83 | Bo Land Inc | Mobridge, SD 57601 | $456,953 |
84 | B 4 B Co | Ridgeview, SD 57652 | $455,402 |
85 | Kim Ulmer | Mobridge, SD 57601 | $446,022 |
86 | Grant Martin | Ridgeview, SD 57652 | $442,114 |
87 | Jennifer Jewett-schoelerman | Mobridge, SD 57601 | $438,959 |
88 | Jules G Lamb | Whitehorse, SD 57661 | $436,830 |
89 | John Maher | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $430,259 |
90 | Archie Jerome Hulm | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $427,421 |
91 | Robert L Booth | Ridgeview, SD 57652 | $421,831 |
92 | Robert D Jackson | Isabel, SD 57633 | $418,173 |
93 | Gerald Booth | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $411,717 |
94 | Craig Thorstenson | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $409,351 |
95 | Troy Vrooman | Eagle Butte, SD 57625 | $408,950 |
96 | Daniel Goldade | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $404,679 |
97 | Randy Berndt | Eagle Butte, SD 57625 | $404,328 |
98 | Dilomarobe Ltd | Ridgeview, SD 57652 | $401,670 |
99 | Steve Aberle | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $400,007 |
100 | Patrick M Gray | Ridgeview, SD 57652 | $399,406 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”