Loan Deficiency in Dewey County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 247
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Dewey County, South Dakota totaled $4,611,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ralph Pesicka | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $5,596 |
122 | Jim Wright | Parade, SD 57647 | $5,593 |
123 | Stan Schlosser | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $5,538 |
124 | Timothy Terrance Leibel | Glencross, SD 57630 | $5,428 |
125 | Jim Schumacher | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $5,291 |
126 | Jim John Bartlett | Isabel, SD 57633 | $5,206 |
127 | Timothy Bollinger | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $5,095 |
128 | Curtis Brenner | Isabel, SD 57633 | $5,001 |
129 | Donald Franks | Trail City, SD 57657 | $4,949 |
130 | James H Hulm | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $4,722 |
131 | Perry L Schuh | Isabel, SD 57633 | $4,628 |
132 | Rausch Family Grain Inc | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $4,303 |
133 | Mary Kaye Gesinger | Eagle Butte, SD 57625 | $4,137 |
134 | Paul Franks | Trail City, SD 57657 | $4,119 |
135 | Avin E Martin | Piedmont, SD 57769 | $4,015 |
136 | Kenneth Anderson | Piedmont, SD 57769 | $4,012 |
137 | Harold Leroy Jackson | Mobridge, SD 57601 | $3,985 |
138 | Joanne Martin | Piedmont, SD 57769 | $3,980 |
139 | Anita Owen Felts | San Saba, TX 76877 | $3,909 |
140 | Lawrence Stein | Isabel, SD 57633 | $3,895 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”