Farm Subsidy information
Dewey County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Dewey County, South Dakota, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 434
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Dewey County, South Dakota totaled $17,694,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Toby Q Keller | Trail City, SD 57657 | $126,801 |
| 22 | Duane Jacob Kraft | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $124,904 |
| 23 | Tom Aberle | Glencross, SD 57630 | $122,220 |
| 24 | Bo Land Inc | Mobridge, SD 57601 | $119,811 |
| 25 | Lyle Dean Anderson | Whitehorse, SD 57661 | $114,583 |
| 26 | Joseph M Locken | Isabel, SD 57633 | $112,565 |
| 27 | Booth Ranch Inc | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $112,526 |
| 28 | Rick Elroy Schrempp | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $105,177 |
| 29 | Jd Cattle Company Inc | Eagle Butte, SD 57625 | $101,773 |
| 30 | Keith Dahlgren | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $100,960 |
| 31 | Circle S Ranch Inc | Isabel, SD 57633 | $100,760 |
| 32 | Sharon Wright | Parade, SD 57625 | $100,141 |
| 33 | Doug Maher | Eagle Butte, SD 57625 | $92,777 |
| 34 | Merle Leibel | Glencross, SD 57630 | $91,536 |
| 35 | Kevin Charles Keckler | Eagle Butte, SD 57625 | $91,100 |
| 36 | Kyle Biegler | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $87,659 |
| 37 | Archie Jerome Hulm | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $86,445 |
| 38 | Todd L Ulmer | Mobridge, SD 57601 | $85,619 |
| 39 | Coffy Enright | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $85,467 |
| 40 | 24 Ranch | Eagle Butte, SD 57625 | $84,828 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf