Total Conservation Programs in Douglas County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 213
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Douglas County, South Dakota totaled $840,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Diane L Dahl | Sioux Falls, SD 57104 | $6,565 |
42 | Todd A Koopal | Geddes, SD 57342 | $6,490 |
43 | Ronald Kelly Jelsma | Armour, SD 57313 | $6,181 |
44 | Dwayne R Werkmeister | Armour, SD 57313 | $6,158 |
45 | Leonard & Hazel Greeneway Living Trust | Armour, SD 57313 | $5,956 |
46 | Karen Tegethoff | Harrison, SD 57344 | $5,781 |
47 | , | $5,738 | |
48 | Darold E Werkmeister Trust | Armour, SD 57313 | $5,586 |
49 | Goetz Family Properties LLC | Sheldon, IA 51201 | $5,429 |
50 | Garhardt Gerlach Irrevocable Interest Only Trust | Menno, SD 57045 | $5,063 |
51 | Brenner Farms LLC | Armour, SD 57313 | $4,710 |
52 | Merlin Ray Vanzee | Harrison, SD 57344 | $4,603 |
53 | Gary Lee Hinckley | Armour, SD 57313 | $4,584 |
54 | Ken Storm | Fargo, ND 58104 | $4,539 |
55 | Rodney L And Malinda L Hinrichs Living Trust | Lincoln, NE 68521 | $4,338 |
56 | Lyle J Schipper Living Trust | Platte, SD 57369 | $4,122 |
57 | Herbert Uttecht | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $4,075 |
58 | Henry J Vanzuidam Revocable Trust | New Holland, SD 57364 | $4,058 |
59 | David D Bitterman | Delmont, SD 57330 | $3,656 |
60 | Harley D & Cynthia A Hubers Legacy Land Trust | Harrison, SD 57344 | $3,514 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”