Farm Subsidy information
Douglas County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Douglas County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,642
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Douglas County, South Dakota totaled $268,763,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Duwayne & Sandra Bialas Living Trust | Parkston, SD 57366 | $491,556 |
82 | Cws Inc | Geddes, SD 57342 | $483,568 |
83 | Wayne Elliot Kaufman | Delmont, SD 57330 | $480,862 |
84 | Floyd Louis Muntefering | Parkston, SD 57366 | $476,245 |
85 | Glen Clarence Moke | Corsica, SD 57328 | $475,529 |
86 | Steven Robert Reichert | Parkston, SD 57366 | $474,208 |
87 | Byron Schelhaas | Corsica, SD 57328 | $474,153 |
88 | Aaron Leonard Lau | Corsica, SD 57328 | $472,546 |
89 | David Renshaw | Armour, SD 57313 | $471,384 |
90 | Lelan J Vanderwerff | Armour, SD 57313 | $466,856 |
91 | Daryl Kim Devries | Armour, SD 57313 | $458,978 |
92 | Wayne Lefers | Corsica, SD 57328 | $457,664 |
93 | Jeffrey Lee Lau | Armour, SD 57313 | $451,999 |
94 | David Nase | Armour, SD 57313 | $442,254 |
95 | Thomas Mark Wegehaupt | Dimock, SD 57331 | $439,425 |
96 | Ewald Raymond Fink | Delmont, SD 57330 | $434,453 |
97 | Douglas Paul Reimnitz | Corsica, SD 57328 | $434,418 |
98 | Steven John Lau | Delmont, SD 57330 | $431,034 |
99 | Gail John Sperlich | Parkston, SD 57366 | $428,943 |
100 | Daniel Kent Deboer | Corsica, SD 57328 | $426,319 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”