Conservation Reserve Program in Douglas County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 194
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Douglas County, South Dakota totaled $691,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | James Albert Leonard | Armour, SD 57313 | $1,969 |
82 | Leighton Dean Lien | Newcastle, WA 98056 | $1,908 |
83 | Garden Hills Farm Inc | Corsica, SD 57328 | $1,894 |
84 | Sunrise Farms Partnership | Harrison, SD 57344 | $1,888 |
85 | Larry Dean Vanzee | Harrison, SD 57344 | $1,783 |
86 | Kent Deboer | Corsica, SD 57328 | $1,738 |
87 | Rhonda Zomer | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $1,728 |
88 | Marvin D & Alma J Lau Family Trust | Armour, SD 57313 | $1,718 |
89 | Constance Thuringer Irrevocable Interest Only Trus | Parkston, SD 57366 | $1,717 |
90 | Jerry Baanhofman | Corsica, SD 57328 | $1,701 |
91 | Van Brothers Inc | Corsica, SD 57328 | $1,695 |
92 | Rodney Van Roekel - Rodney Van Roekel Ira | Corsica, SD 57328 | $1,677 |
93 | Baier Family Limited Partnership | Dimock, SD 57331 | $1,594 |
94 | Shirley Kelly | Rochester, MN 55906 | $1,512 |
95 | Vincent Spease | Rapid City, SD 57701 | $1,470 |
96 | Valrae Schwaderer | Delmont, SD 57330 | $1,470 |
97 | Virginia Gunderson | Woodbury, MN 55129 | $1,470 |
98 | Van Spease | Wagner, SD 57380 | $1,470 |
99 | Darcy June Wright | Corsica, SD 57328 | $1,423 |
100 | Doris E Heisinger | Parkston, SD 57366 | $1,325 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”