Total Conservation Programs in Douglas County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 213
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Douglas County, South Dakota totaled $840,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Rodney Lee Delange | Corsica, SD 57328 | $2,312 |
82 | Garden Hills Farm Inc | Corsica, SD 57328 | $2,284 |
83 | Harlan Veurink | Platte, SD 57369 | $2,248 |
84 | Mark Alan Fuoss | Armour, SD 57313 | $2,229 |
85 | Vonda S Schulte | Geddes, SD 57342 | $2,163 |
86 | Tammie Mayer | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $2,163 |
87 | Lisa Van Dusseldorp | Platte, SD 57369 | $2,162 |
88 | Larry Dean Vanzee | Harrison, SD 57344 | $2,141 |
89 | Van Brothers Inc | Corsica, SD 57328 | $2,066 |
90 | Rodney Van Roekel - Rodney Van Roekel Ira | Corsica, SD 57328 | $2,049 |
91 | Russell Dean Ledeboer | Armour, SD 57313 | $2,001 |
92 | Ryan Paulson | Geddes, SD 57342 | $1,977 |
93 | Catrina Paulson | Platte, SD 57369 | $1,977 |
94 | Jerry Baanhofman | Corsica, SD 57328 | $1,832 |
95 | Rhonda Zomer | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $1,728 |
96 | Constance Thuringer Irrevocable Interest Only Trus | Parkston, SD 57366 | $1,717 |
97 | Kent Deboer | Corsica, SD 57328 | $1,694 |
98 | Marvin D & Alma J Lau Family Trust | Armour, SD 57313 | $1,684 |
99 | Baier Family Limited Partnership | Dimock, SD 57331 | $1,594 |
100 | Gregory J Putnam & Elizabeth K Putnam Joint Revoca | Corsica, SD 57328 | $1,589 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”