Total Commodity Programs in Douglas County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,398
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Douglas County, South Dakota totaled $117,920,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Wayne Lefers | Corsica, SD 57328 | $396,589 |
82 | Duwayne & Sandra Bialas Living Trust | Parkston, SD 57366 | $396,088 |
83 | David Henry Hartmann | Armour, SD 57313 | $395,692 |
84 | Fox Ridge LLC | Corsica, SD 57328 | $395,310 |
85 | Daryl Kim Devries | Armour, SD 57313 | $392,588 |
86 | Ewald Raymond Fink | Delmont, SD 57330 | $386,195 |
87 | Jeffrey Lee Lau | Armour, SD 57313 | $383,808 |
88 | Douglas Paul Reimnitz | Corsica, SD 57328 | $377,169 |
89 | Aaron Leonard Lau | Corsica, SD 57328 | $376,011 |
90 | Nicholas Lee Hoffman | Armour, SD 57313 | $373,203 |
91 | Thomas Mark Wegehaupt | Dimock, SD 57331 | $370,772 |
92 | Richard L Reimnitz | Corsica, SD 57328 | $370,489 |
93 | Daniel Kent Deboer | Corsica, SD 57328 | $364,663 |
94 | Todd Gerlach | Parkston, SD 57366 | $361,257 |
95 | Steven John Lau | Delmont, SD 57330 | $359,125 |
96 | Gail John Sperlich | Parkston, SD 57366 | $343,041 |
97 | Darren Michael Fechner | Delmont, SD 57330 | $341,099 |
98 | Victor Dean Munneke | New Holland, SD 57364 | $331,195 |
99 | Kenneth Ymker | Armour, SD 57313 | $328,640 |
100 | Will-syl Living Trust | Parkston, SD 57366 | $326,544 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”