Farm Subsidy information
Douglas County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Douglas County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 596
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Douglas County, South Dakota totaled $14,434,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Benjamin G Tegethoff & Ellen K Tegethoff Irrev Rea | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $19,780 |
102 | Leroy Blom | Corsica, SD 57328 | $19,380 |
103 | Wayne Lefers | Corsica, SD 57328 | $19,371 |
104 | Taylor Marvin Blom | Corsica, SD 57328 | $19,138 |
105 | D & M Leasing Inc | Corsica, SD 57328 | $19,051 |
106 | Kevin Alan Lefers | Corsica, SD 57328 | $18,913 |
107 | Thomas Goehring | Delmont, SD 57330 | $18,719 |
108 | Donavan Dean Goehring | Delmont, SD 57330 | $18,471 |
109 | Charles Curtis Buhler Trust | Armour, SD 57313 | $18,250 |
110 | Jeremy Joseph Wright | Corsica, SD 57328 | $18,180 |
111 | Glenn Gerhard Storm | Corsica, SD 57328 | $18,155 |
112 | Seth Cameron Reimnitz | Armour, SD 57313 | $18,115 |
113 | Ernest W Bertram | Armour, SD 57313 | $17,515 |
114 | Aaron J Wright | Corsica, SD 57328 | $17,488 |
115 | Jeffrey J Zoss | Armour, SD 57313 | $17,485 |
116 | Gregg Olawsky | Corsica, SD 57328 | $17,281 |
117 | Thomas Mark Wegehaupt | Dimock, SD 57331 | $17,197 |
118 | Edward E Nolz | Sioux Falls, SD 57104 | $17,138 |
119 | Jarren Bartelt | Dimock, SD 57331 | $17,129 |
120 | J & J Hogs Inc | Harrison, SD 57344 | $17,063 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”