Farm Subsidy information
Douglas County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Douglas County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 478
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Douglas County, South Dakota totaled $15,276,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Robert Lyle Holleman | Harrison, SD 57344 | $10,685 |
122 | Douglas Bitterman | Delmont, SD 57330 | $10,568 |
123 | Richard Vanzuidam | Corsica, SD 57328 | $10,271 |
124 | Randy Veurink | Harrison, SD 57344 | $10,171 |
125 | Danny Lee Bosma | Corsica, SD 57328 | $10,157 |
126 | Matthew James Horstman | Parkston, SD 57366 | $10,067 |
127 | Marshall & Mary Ringling Living Trust | Platte, SD 57369 | $10,002 |
128 | Tyler Scott Lau | Parkston, SD 57366 | $9,969 |
129 | H & H Farm Partnership | Armour, SD 57313 | $9,887 |
130 | Eldon G Baier Revocable Living Trust | Dimock, SD 57331 | $9,716 |
131 | Derek Deboer | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $9,696 |
132 | Joshua Jon Bialas | Parkston, SD 57366 | $9,672 |
133 | Tegethoff Family Irr Income Only Trust | Platte, SD 57369 | $9,584 |
134 | , | $9,531 | |
135 | Richard Lee Thuringer | Delmont, SD 57330 | $9,462 |
136 | Lee Joseph Horstman | Parkston, SD 57366 | $9,413 |
137 | Mclain Enhanced Pheasant Properti | Golden Valley, MN 55426 | $9,386 |
138 | Richard Sparks | Armour, SD 57313 | $9,367 |
139 | Keith Vandenhoek | Corsica, SD 57328 | $9,264 |
140 | , | $9,252 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”