Farm Subsidy information
Douglas County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Douglas County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 596
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Douglas County, South Dakota totaled $14,434,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | James Lefers | Corsica, SD 57328 | $10,938 |
182 | Keith Vandenhoek | Corsica, SD 57328 | $10,754 |
183 | Otto Franklin Fousek | Armour, SD 57313 | $10,730 |
184 | Douglas Paul Reimnitz | Corsica, SD 57328 | $10,646 |
185 | Rodney Allen Uttecht | Armour, SD 57313 | $10,514 |
186 | Brady Glen Moke | Corsica, SD 57328 | $10,484 |
187 | Elmer Goehring | Delmont, SD 57330 | $10,443 |
188 | Richard Lee Thuringer | Delmont, SD 57330 | $10,359 |
189 | Tyler Veurink | New Holland, SD 57364 | $10,318 |
190 | Laroy Lefers | Corsica, SD 57328 | $10,258 |
191 | Melvin Dean Veurink | Harrison, SD 57344 | $10,170 |
192 | Josh Rands | Parkston, SD 57366 | $10,025 |
193 | Mark Marlin Herbst | Dimock, SD 57331 | $9,979 |
194 | Gary Lee Hinckley | Armour, SD 57313 | $9,964 |
195 | Danney Werkmeister | Platte, SD 57369 | $9,913 |
196 | Lowell Gene Bye | Corsica, SD 57328 | $9,911 |
197 | Richard Roland Luebke | Parkston, SD 57366 | $9,910 |
198 | Renshaw Family Living Trust | Armour, SD 57313 | $9,840 |
199 | Ronald Neugebauer | Dimock, SD 57331 | $9,703 |
200 | Victor Dean Munneke | New Holland, SD 57364 | $9,661 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”