Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in Douglas County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 153
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in Douglas County, South Dakota totaled $766,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | David James Wagner | Parkston, SD 57366 | $8,766 |
22 | Nicholas Lee Hoffman | Armour, SD 57313 | $8,759 |
23 | Rodney Allen Uttecht | Armour, SD 57313 | $8,544 |
24 | David Huber | Armour, SD 57313 | $7,824 |
25 | Verne T Carda | Armour, SD 57313 | $7,778 |
26 | S And S Farms A Southdakota Partnership | Corsica, SD 57328 | $7,719 |
27 | Steven John Lau | Delmont, SD 57330 | $7,478 |
28 | Shane Niewenhuis | Corsica, SD 57328 | $7,446 |
29 | Randy Lee Kraemer | Armour, SD 57313 | $7,335 |
30 | Chris Dykshorn | Platte, SD 57369 | $7,167 |
31 | Laib Brothers Farm Partnership | Armour, SD 57313 | $6,923 |
32 | Carl Abram Hoogers | Armour, SD 57313 | $6,871 |
33 | Jay Dewaard | Armour, SD 57313 | $6,820 |
34 | Marshall & Mary Ringling Living Trust | Platte, SD 57369 | $6,801 |
35 | Marvin Muilenburg | Corsica, SD 57328 | $6,396 |
36 | Richard L Reimnitz | Corsica, SD 57328 | $6,376 |
37 | Allan Vanroekel | Corsica, SD 57328 | $6,036 |
38 | Kevin Alan Lefers | Corsica, SD 57328 | $5,753 |
39 | Rudy William Niewenhuis | Corsica, SD 57328 | $5,613 |
40 | Gary Laib | Armour, SD 57313 | $5,351 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”