Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Douglas County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 193
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Douglas County, South Dakota totaled $3,187,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Steve Bamberg | Corsica, SD 57328 | $25,023 |
42 | Scott Alan Bultje | Platte, SD 57369 | $24,585 |
43 | Jared Dean Bultje | Corsica, SD 57328 | $24,585 |
44 | Terry Lee Klumb | Dimock, SD 57331 | $24,324 |
45 | Daniel Kent Deboer | Corsica, SD 57328 | $24,188 |
46 | Lowell Gene Bye | Corsica, SD 57328 | $24,152 |
47 | Steven Robert Reichert | Parkston, SD 57366 | $24,117 |
48 | Trent A Delange | Corsica, SD 57328 | $23,914 |
49 | Jerry Baanhofman | Corsica, SD 57328 | $23,445 |
50 | Baanhofman Family Trust | Corsica, SD 57328 | $23,168 |
51 | Richard Vanderpol | Corsica, SD 57328 | $23,066 |
52 | Marlin Maas | Corsica, SD 57328 | $22,451 |
53 | Terry Lee Goehring | Delmont, SD 57330 | $22,016 |
54 | Delwin Feenstra | Harrison, SD 57344 | $21,659 |
55 | Garry Bultje | Corsica, SD 57328 | $20,566 |
56 | Wilbur & Geneva Beltman Living Tr | Corsica, SD 57328 | $19,313 |
57 | Michael Ringling | Platte, SD 57369 | $18,867 |
58 | Roger Feenstra | Harrison, SD 57344 | $18,737 |
59 | David Huber | Armour, SD 57313 | $18,235 |
60 | Glenn Gerhard Storm | Corsica, SD 57328 | $18,137 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”