Market Gains in Douglas County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 159
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Douglas County, South Dakota totaled $2,747,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Luebke Farms Inc | Parkston, SD 57366 | $209,561 |
2 | Larry Ray Baanhofman | Corsica, SD 57328 | $192,683 |
3 | Greenwood Hutterian Brethren Inc | Delmont, SD 57330 | $181,434 |
4 | Gail & Mary Vanderwerff Living Trust | Armour, SD 57313 | $151,229 |
5 | Stanley Herbert Gerlach | Corsica, SD 57328 | $140,731 |
6 | Gene Leroy Bringelson | Armour, SD 57313 | $126,375 |
7 | Eldon G Baier Revocable Living Trust | Dimock, SD 57331 | $65,445 |
8 | Russell Lee Metzger | Corsica, SD 57328 | $62,440 |
9 | Roland Richard Fink | Parkston, SD 57366 | $60,095 |
10 | David James Wagner | Parkston, SD 57366 | $55,401 |
11 | Robert Vanderpol & Sons | Geddes, SD 57342 | $51,317 |
12 | John Robert Fink | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $50,194 |
13 | Bernard Martin Schelling | Armour, SD 57313 | $47,068 |
14 | Moege Farms Inc | Parkston, SD 57366 | $47,044 |
15 | Norman Lee Delange | Corsica, SD 57328 | $46,656 |
16 | Michael Timothy Goehring | Delmont, SD 57330 | $44,887 |
17 | Ronald William Fuoss | Armour, SD 57313 | $39,876 |
18 | Robert Russell Goodnow | Armour, SD 57313 | $36,130 |
19 | Dennis Ernest Ziebart | Delmont, SD 57330 | $32,603 |
20 | Gerald Herbert Moege | Dimock, SD 57331 | $31,981 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>