Farm Subsidy information
Edmunds County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Edmunds County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 675
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Edmunds County, South Dakota totaled $76,005,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ajb Partnership | Roscoe, SD 57471 | $615,978 |
2 | Dewald Farm | Roscoe, SD 57471 | $548,549 |
3 | Vogel Farm | Akaska, SD 57420 | $532,668 |
4 | C&c Olson Farm Partnership | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $490,992 |
5 | Deerfield Hutt Bret Inc | Ipswich, SD 57451 | $489,969 |
6 | Davis Farms | Mina, SD 57451 | $469,222 |
7 | Haar Farms Inc | Onaka, SD 57466 | $438,828 |
8 | Hoffman Farms Partnership | Bowdle, SD 57428 | $424,462 |
9 | Malsam Farms Inc | Roscoe, SD 57471 | $413,231 |
10 | Burgod Farms | Ipswich, SD 57451 | $411,158 |
11 | Plainview Hutterian Brethren Inc | Leola, SD 57456 | $410,316 |
12 | Heilman Farming Inc | Warner, SD 57479 | $400,299 |
13 | Michael G Petersen | Cresbard, SD 57435 | $398,398 |
14 | Rock Bottom Farms Inc | Roscoe, SD 57471 | $396,934 |
15 | Wayne Simon & Jerad Simon Ptrs | Tolstoy, SD 57475 | $394,534 |
16 | Geier Family Farm LLC | Bowdle, SD 57428 | $388,881 |
17 | Bruce A Fuhrmann | Roscoe, SD 57471 | $376,707 |
18 | Rosette Hutterian Brethren Inc | Leola, SD 57456 | $374,123 |
19 | Shawn Nehlich | Ipswich, SD 57451 | $364,780 |
20 | Wyatt John Isaac Geditz | Ipswich, SD 57451 | $356,468 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>