Emergency Conservation Program in Faulk County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 181
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Faulk County, South Dakota totaled $1,185,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Steven R Wood | Chelsea, SD 57465 | $14,813 |
22 | Chad P Homan | Faulkton, SD 57438 | $14,552 |
23 | Dwight F Melius | Northville, SD 57465 | $14,526 |
24 | Melius Farms & Feedlot | Faulkton, SD 57438 | $14,449 |
25 | Randy R Barondeau | Frederick, SD 57441 | $14,123 |
26 | Bruce Hoffman | Rockham, SD 57470 | $13,715 |
27 | Thomas O Meyer | Orient, SD 57467 | $13,636 |
28 | Wayne Zeigler | Seneca, SD 57473 | $13,558 |
29 | Terry Raymond Huss | Faulkton, SD 57438 | $12,353 |
30 | Gary Bowar | Miranda, SD 57438 | $12,265 |
31 | Hardie Farms Inc | Seneca, SD 57473 | $11,729 |
32 | Hoven Ag Farm | Hoven, SD 57450 | $11,568 |
33 | Denis Walker | Faulkton, SD 57438 | $11,297 |
34 | Peter Franck | Cresbard, SD 57435 | $11,263 |
35 | Roger Gutenkauf | Onaka, SD 57466 | $10,628 |
36 | Dennis & Linda Mutsch Living Trust | Rockham, SD 57470 | $10,177 |
37 | Dick Edgar | Rockham, SD 57470 | $9,720 |
38 | Dale Mcquown | Seneca, SD 57473 | $9,510 |
39 | Joe Aesoph | Seneca, SD 57473 | $8,834 |
40 | Duane Aesoph | Seneca, SD 57473 | $8,833 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”