Farm Subsidy information
Faulk County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Faulk County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 325
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Faulk County, South Dakota totaled $21,199,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Dale Mcquown | Seneca, SD 57473 | $11,189 |
82 | , | $11,049 | |
83 | Conner Hardie | Seneca, SD 57473 | $10,905 |
84 | , | $10,799 | |
85 | Elsing Family Living Trust | Northville, SD 57465 | $10,795 |
86 | Matthew R Bossly | Faulkton, SD 57438 | $10,716 |
87 | Dale William Holt | Cresbard, SD 57435 | $10,348 |
88 | Steven S Schilder And Mary A Schilder Lvg Rev Trst | Faulkton, SD 57438 | $10,026 |
89 | Alexander W Thomas | Onaka, SD 57466 | $9,951 |
90 | Aesoph Farms LLC | Highmore, SD 57345 | $9,946 |
91 | Hansen Ranch Inc | Faulkton, SD 57438 | $9,680 |
92 | Jami Lynn Huss | Faulkton, SD 57438 | $9,359 |
93 | Vetch Enterprises Inc | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $9,298 |
94 | Patrick A Zens | Redfield, SD 57469 | $9,103 |
95 | Craig J Huss | Faulkton, SD 57438 | $9,058 |
96 | Brian Schulz | Faulkton, SD 57438 | $8,959 |
97 | Thomas M Newman | Faulkton, SD 57438 | $8,892 |
98 | Kretschmar Farms | Cresbard, SD 57435 | $8,809 |
99 | Steward Farms Inc | Chelsea, SD 57465 | $8,652 |
100 | Roger Gutenkauf | Onaka, SD 57466 | $8,600 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”