Production Flexibility Program in Grant County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 958
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Grant County, South Dakota totaled $16,644,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Charles Raymond Wollschlager | Revillo, SD 57259 | $84,992 |
42 | Jeff S Schmidt | Twin Brooks, SD 57269 | $84,461 |
43 | James Edward Mertens | Milbank, SD 57252 | $83,032 |
44 | Donald F Kasuske | Twin Brooks, SD 57269 | $81,605 |
45 | John Joseph Roggenbuck Jr | Revillo, SD 57259 | $79,928 |
46 | Timothy Idean Miller | Milbank, SD 57252 | $78,489 |
47 | Marlyn R Johnson | Labolt, SD 57246 | $78,421 |
48 | Ronald Meyer | Revillo, SD 57259 | $77,728 |
49 | George Mertens | Milbank, SD 57252 | $77,709 |
50 | Douglas Wollschlager | Revillo, SD 57259 | $77,555 |
51 | Gene A And Shirley M Jibben Revo | Watertown, SD 57201 | $77,214 |
52 | Lloyd Duane Tillma | Twin Brooks, SD 57269 | $76,884 |
53 | Jeffrey Paul Schuelke | Revillo, SD 57259 | $75,885 |
54 | Wm D Schuler | Twin Brooks, SD 57269 | $75,540 |
55 | Gregory A Wollschlager | Revillo, SD 57259 | $75,314 |
56 | Douglas Mark Barlund | Milbank, SD 57252 | $74,314 |
57 | Gerald Folk Revocable Trust | Sioux Falls, SD 57117 | $73,624 |
58 | Johnson Farms | Labolt, SD 57246 | $72,716 |
59 | Timothy Rabe | Big Stone City, SD 57216 | $72,310 |
60 | David Edward Wollschlager | Revillo, SD 57259 | $71,673 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”