Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Grant County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 196
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Grant County, South Dakota totaled $999,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Michael Bernard Krakow | Labolt, SD 57246 | $3,304 |
62 | Lynn J Lupinek | Summit, SD 57266 | $3,094 |
63 | Ricky Aslesen | Ortley, SD 57256 | $3,027 |
64 | Loren J Holscher | Twin Brooks, SD 57269 | $2,897 |
65 | Daron Zemlicka | Watertown, SD 57201 | $2,838 |
66 | Whetstone Grazing LLC | Twin Brooks, SD 57269 | $2,826 |
67 | Mark Aslesen | Ortley, SD 57256 | $2,802 |
68 | Levi Waddell | Marvin, SD 57251 | $2,779 |
69 | Mark Kriesel | Summit, SD 57266 | $2,727 |
70 | Corey J Amdahl | Summit, SD 57266 | $2,726 |
71 | Daniel Linn Berger | Waubay, SD 57273 | $2,709 |
72 | Aaron Holscher | Twin Brooks, SD 57269 | $2,707 |
73 | James Elga Pike | Summit, SD 57266 | $2,681 |
74 | David Eric Crocker | Labolt, SD 57246 | $2,667 |
75 | Neal Lynn Mielitz | Big Stone City, SD 57216 | $2,627 |
76 | Ryan Jay Mielitz | Milbank, SD 57252 | $2,621 |
77 | Craig A Mielitz | Big Stone City, SD 57216 | $2,616 |
78 | Todd Fredrick Seehafer | Corona, SD 57227 | $2,572 |
79 | Michael Holtquist | Big Stone City, SD 57216 | $2,562 |
80 | Paul Hartsoch | Marvin, SD 57251 | $2,536 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”