Farm Subsidy information
Grant County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Grant County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 498
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Grant County, South Dakota totaled $13,361,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Schaefer Farms Inc | Hancock, MN 56244 | $12,452 |
82 | Marlin W Berkner | Stockholm, SD 57264 | $12,415 |
83 | Alban Acres Inc | Milbank, SD 57252 | $12,233 |
84 | Gerald Dean Peters | Milbank, SD 57252 | $12,141 |
85 | Terrance Edwin Meister | Revillo, SD 57259 | $12,006 |
86 | Duane W Steege | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $11,969 |
87 | Dwayne J Breyer | Hot Springs, SD 57747 | $11,769 |
88 | Neal V Johnson | Minneapolis, MN 55419 | $11,617 |
89 | Paul D Peterson | Labolt, SD 57246 | $11,467 |
90 | Mark Aslesen | Ortley, SD 57256 | $11,363 |
91 | Dikstaal Family Trust | Brookings, SD 57006 | $11,336 |
92 | Nathan Bruce Granquist | Strandburg, SD 57265 | $11,197 |
93 | Robert W Johnson | Milbank, SD 57252 | $10,936 |
94 | Christopher Randall Zubke | Milbank, SD 57252 | $10,856 |
95 | Joel Patrick O'brien | Milbank, SD 57252 | $10,829 |
96 | Patricia Dvorak | Litchfield, MN 55355 | $10,789 |
97 | Diane Karsten | Newton, IA 50208 | $10,789 |
98 | Sherry Alice Deboer | Corona, SD 57227 | $10,762 |
99 | Leslie John Peters | Milbank, SD 57252 | $10,700 |
100 | Bruce Granquist | Milbank, SD 57252 | $10,653 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”