Conservation Reserve Program in Grant County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 234
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Grant County, South Dakota totaled $1,212,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Carolyn L Boulay | Minneapolis, MN 55417 | $3,550 |
102 | Clarice Berg | Labolt, SD 57246 | $3,506 |
103 | Travis John Bjordahl | Milbank, SD 57252 | $3,459 |
104 | Cheryl J. Berger Limited Partnership | Ortley, SD 57256 | $3,406 |
105 | Mark Lee | Big Stone City, SD 57216 | $3,385 |
106 | Jeffrey Paul Schuelke | Revillo, SD 57259 | $3,318 |
107 | Darwin Johnson | Stockholm, SD 57264 | $3,295 |
108 | Douglas Peiker | Revillo, SD 57259 | $3,273 |
109 | Laura Tiernan | Overland Park, KS 66223 | $3,264 |
110 | Merle Edward Busjahn Jr | Sioux Falls, SD 57110 | $3,254 |
111 | Betty Hoffman | Twin Brooks, SD 57269 | $3,169 |
112 | Steven Michael Schank | Monona, WI 53716 | $3,079 |
113 | James Edward Mertens | Milbank, SD 57252 | $3,025 |
114 | Lohr Family Llp | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $2,896 |
115 | David John Hicks | Twin Brooks, SD 57269 | $2,852 |
116 | Rocky Meadows Inc | Milbank, SD 57252 | $2,802 |
117 | J&m Land Co | Marvin, SD 57251 | $2,780 |
118 | Eugene Louis Boerger | Milbank, SD 57252 | $2,729 |
119 | Jeff S Schmidt | Twin Brooks, SD 57269 | $2,577 |
120 | Hicks Brothers | Milbank, SD 57252 | $2,426 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”