Farm Subsidy information
Grant County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Grant County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 498
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Grant County, South Dakota totaled $13,361,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Richard Meagher | Milbank, SD 57252 | $9,340 |
122 | Mark Philip Rethke | Milbank, SD 57252 | $9,081 |
123 | James Zirbel | South Shore, SD 57263 | $9,062 |
124 | Liebe Farms Inc | Milbank, SD 57252 | $8,954 |
125 | David J Dingsor | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $8,869 |
126 | Ashley Paul Dummann | Summit, SD 57266 | $8,826 |
127 | Steven J Farrell | Milbank, SD 57252 | $8,723 |
128 | Stephen C Fonder | Big Stone City, SD 57216 | $8,481 |
129 | Paul D Fonder | Big Stone City, SD 57216 | $8,481 |
130 | , | $8,232 | |
131 | Janice K Letze | Milbank, SD 57252 | $8,113 |
132 | Jeremiah Victor Mcfarland | Milbank, SD 57252 | $8,099 |
133 | Mark Erickson | Labolt, SD 57246 | $8,059 |
134 | Brian Buttke | Corona, SD 57227 | $8,056 |
135 | Anthony R Howard | Milbank, SD 57252 | $8,039 |
136 | Blake A Sime | Revillo, SD 57259 | $8,005 |
137 | Raymond W Beutler | Milbank, SD 57252 | $7,898 |
138 | Derek Paul Nelson | Revillo, SD 57259 | $7,895 |
139 | Kraig Haase | Hayti, SD 57241 | $7,681 |
140 | Mark Granquist | Milbank, SD 57252 | $7,495 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”